The church of secular sciences

In the 1300s AD, the Roman Catholic church handed out the first diplomas to clergymen whom they believed were more qualified to conduct science than the rest of the world. As time went on, those clergymen segregated themselves from the church and decided that they were the only people qualified to decide who is qualified to practice science.

Cut ahead to the early 1900s. After many years of being a church with no prophets, the secular institutions of science were graced by the presence of a man who takes credit for compiling the work of other people. His name was Albert Einstein, and he compiled a set of theories together into an incoherent mess that destabilized our understanding of quantum physics for the next 115 years. The works of the people he stole from have been proven to be true. But the portions that he "included" have all fallen short of any real notability. 

The greatest sin of mankind is to believe that we know everything. The first step toward education is the admittance that we truly know an immeasurably low percentage of the total knowledge of the universe. But Einstein is seen by the church of science as a prophet who brought forth all of the secrets of the universe, and we merely are too stupid to comprehend them.

Whether or not I believe in relativity is irrelevant, because the appropriate way to approach scientific inquiry is to consider every possibility available. I will theorize within the limits of relativity, and far outside of the limits of relativity, all for the pursuit of deciphering one more immeasurably low percentage of the universe's information. I will pursue the human narrative, the mythological narrative, and the exoterrestrial narrative equally as if all could be possible.

If I am to be crucified by the church of secular science, then let it be so. But as far as I'm concerned; all secular degrees are given by another branch of the Roman Catholic church. The unfortunate reality is that they use the same societal control tactics to prevent us from collaboratively advancing humanity's interests. 

Like the priests who claimed that only they were pure enough to speak to god, so too do the paper-wielding maniacs of the church of science proclaim that only they hold the authority to decide what is scientific and what is not. But here are the logical fallacies with that notion:

- Secular science and the scientific method propose that empirical evidence can only be found if data can be corroborated by separate teams or people, but then they tell us that only a few people are allowed to view the data or observe the machines that are used to collect that data. 

- Data that no average person can verify collected by machines that nobody can use or view determined by teams of people who are selectively chosen by the same people who choose the corroborators. When something says "peer reviewed" it really just means "our friends agree with us". 

- Piles of equations consisting entirely of variables that are somehow solvable but are never demonstrated to be solved. Papers written that surround those equations without providing the real numbers that are supposed to replace supplemental variables. Considered empirical because somebody showed it to their friends, and they agreed with them.

- Restricting access to science and scientific equipment by extorting millions, nay billions of dollars from a select few elites who can afford it. Those who cannot afford it are sunken into secular debt, leading to a lifetime of servitude that they can never escape from.

- Determining who is allowed to teach our children based entirely on whether or not somebody sat through many years of boredom and financial distress to receive a piece of paper given to them by church of science institutions who control the flow of information and reject any reasonable debate of their empiricism. 

- Why do you think it's called "empirical evidence"? Because the church of science is an empire that controls all scientific information. They use your taxes and your labor and then tell you that you have made no meaningful contributions to science or humanity unless you have been ordained as a priest of the church of science.

For 24 years, I lived a life of acceptance. I accepted science when I was told it was true. I denied theories that stretched beyond the scope of normality. I actively avoided digging into more controversial subjects because I, like many other people, was convinced that %99 of weird theories were too crazy or far-fetched to possibly be true. That all changed for me this year.

I need to go back a little bit, to a time just before Covid. In 2019, I looked into the esoteric for the very first time. I had plenty of exposure in small, concentrated bursts throughout my life, but it wasn't until recently when I decided to look deeper into everything I knew. I read the translations of the Sumerian tablets, I read the Bible, Hebrew and KJ, I read the Septuagint, I read the Methodist books of Discipline, Worship and Order, I read the book of Mormon and the Pearl of Great Price, and I studied the official timeline of events to make sure I understood the entire story. It didn't really bother me at first. I had questions like everybody has. Stuff like who really built the pyramids, and why do so many of the stories sound similar. But that's really where the idea came to a halt. My mentality was that these stories were pure fiction, and that wars were started because a bunch of people who believed in the exact same thing were convinced that their religion was the only religion. 

I've always had a fascination with the exoterrestrial. It's impossible to go out, look at the sky, and not wonder what life could possibly be living out there. But a sense of wonder is usually only that. Wonder. Conjecture. In 2020, I came across the translated book of alien races for the first time. Needless to say, the entire book sounds like a work of lunacy. That is until the dots start to connect to each other. References to the A'nun'na'ki, dates and places that correspond with real videos that claim to be UFO sightings, precise descriptions of aircraft that align with sightings that are completely unrelated, and even a few very believable images. I started to dig further. 

Before anything else, I wanted to know more about the Emerther. "Skinny bob" of the "family vacation" leaked film reels. All of the other races in the book are negligible, can be taken as "maybe" when examined with some depth. But the Emerther are something completely different. Let's start with the designation. "Skinny bob". Despite how it sounds, it isn't actually a name. Bob is another word for friendly, just like Tango is another word for enemy. There is no definitive beginning to this colloquialism, and some claim that it suddenly began widespread use in the Vietnam war. But if it suddenly became widespread, it probably didn't begin during the Vietnam war. Anybody who knows anything about classical American slang knows that the "skinny" is a slang term for "information." From this, we can deduce that "Skinny bob" actually means "Friendly Informant". 

Okay, so that lines up with the book. It says that the Emerther are the most important species in something called "The Council of Five" and that they work fairly hard to protect humanity from itself and outside threats. There's a video called "family vacation" where many of these beings are allegedly captured on film, and it is quite convincing. In the original "Ivan" cut, he prefaces the situation stating that the Emerther were coming around to discuss diplomatic matters with high-ranking officials. One stipulation was that the meetings would be completely confidential. A hidden camera was allegedly used to capture the footage, and the video ends with the statement that the treaty between them and our people was revised shortly after. 

So, if they weren't allowed to film, then why are there more videos? That question was answered already. The treaty was revised. If you read the description of these beings in the book, they're described as a completely peaceful race. That aligns with the idea that they would allow humans to film them more, and it indicates that the idea of confidentiality was something proposed by our own species. We're all well aware of the compartmentalization of government following World War 2, and moreso aware of how heavily redacted most of our declassified information is.

The second video, a body scan from leg to head, gives us a clearer look at the anatomy of the beings. To say that their features are "elongated" is a bit of a stretch. The hands and fingers are elongated, definitely. But their leg, hip and torso structures align with that of our own. The being in this particular video is holding a feminine stance. Weight is rested on the right leg, with a slight crescent bend in the body. Hip to rib structure also appears to be feminine, as indicated by the trademark hip>rib hourglass ratio. Arms appear to be lower than our own due to a flattened collar bone structure. Our own is more bowl shaped. Collar muscle is taller by extension. Neck appears to be similar to our own. Feminine, without excess thyroid cartilage. Face is a work of beauty. Feminine jaw structure, small nose, mouth identical to our own, and large eyes. Cranium is much larger, brain volume likely around 90-100 cubic inches.  The absence of ears is interesting. Overall, these creatures are actually rather comforting to look at. The word that fits the most is "beautiful."

The third video is of what appears to be one of these creatures "working" on something. It's impossible to determine what it might be, but needless to say these videos have piqued my curiosity. I wanted to know more. I went searching for every perspective on these videos, primarily looking for a reasonable explanation to debunk what I was seeing. It was here where I found myself on the r/skinnybob subreddit. Truth be told, I think Reddit has become a cesspool of ideological tribalism, but that actually is helpful in this particular instance. There is no greater help to learn about a topic than those who obsess over a topic. 

But now I have more questions than answers. Have you ever seen Intel ops before? The entire modus operandi of misinformation campaigns is to modify and insert real things. The modification to present the idea that what you are looking at is farce, and the insertion thereof to make you believe that anything similar is fake. According to the nutjobs on the r/skinnybob forum, the videos have been debunked because film grain and timestamps were added to the footage in post processing. But there's a major discrepancy with those debunks: The film effects that are proven to have been used weren't released onto a public storefront until five months AFTER the release of the Ivan videos. That put me in a snag. On the one hand, it could be an effect created and sold by the video creator. On the other hand, it could have been released to further the idea that it's fake. The r/skinnybob subreddit was inconclusive and unhelpful, and the majority of denialists seem to have no idea how misinformation campaigns work or why they are conducted to begin with.

More unhelpful still, there are claims that full unedited versions of these videos exist somewhere, but I couldn't find them. Major search engines won't even show these videos unless you specifically include words like "ivan", "leak","full video", or "ET" while searching for skinny bob, and even then, you may have to look for a minute. I began to hunt for a trail of videos, and where I ended up was more surprising than I could have ever expected. Back in the alien races book, on the very front page; the writer of the book provides a link to a YouTube channel that doesn't exist anymore. After digging through the wayback machine, I found out that this channel and Dante Santori did actually exist, and videos were being released for many years. Most of them are political conspiracies and the like, which wouldn't actually be that noteworthy under normal circumstances. But when I found a real link to the channel that still works today, it was even more confusing.

The channel, formerly by the name of Azazel8867, was taken down by YouTube for "violating community guidelines." For conspiracy theories? That doesn't make sense. YouTube is brimming with conspiracy theorist content, so that couldn't possibly be it. I found the very last snapshot of the channel, dated February 24th, 2014. The final video that was verifiably uploaded to this channel was "Seraphinianus: The Illuminati Codex". The very next snapshot is dated one month later. March 13th, 2014, the Azazel8867 channel is removed from YouTube. The snapshot does not say that it violated community guidelines. It just says "Channel is closed and no longer available." Given the year of removal, one would expect to see the community guideline violation prompt since it was introduced earlier than 2014. So we can confirm that it was not a violation of community guidelines. I smell a coverup.

Given this situation, I wanted to know more about Dante Santori. But there is one problem with that. Dante Santori has been mostly erased from the internet. If you search for his name including taglines like "azazel" or "aliens" you will only find references to the book. In this case, it was actually Copilot who spilled the beans with some extra information. Daniel Santori was not just some random conspiracy theorist who did not previously exist. He was some kind of special forces corporal from Portugal. I followed that trail and ended up on the r/creepy reddit post from 7 years ago that was removed with no further details. There appears to be a widespread effort to erase Dante Santori. He was discharged from the Portugal military shortly after the release of the book, discredited as a grifter for asking for monetary support, and effectively erased in large scale across various regions of the clearnet including forums, videos, and even third-party questions and corroborations.

In a place where I was hoping maybe I could find information pertaining to whether or not these things were hoaxes; I instead found myself on the crux of a massive string of rabbit holes that lead to deleted accounts and people who don't exist. I found myself seeing the obvious signs of mod/inject, but to such a wide degree that it became much more suspicious. I started to follow the lines. One of them, a well decorated soviet leader, was demoted from his position two years after his letter in this book was written.  The next was a ufo encounter dated 2002 in Buenos Aires. Footage of this sighting exists. The next was a hint to take a look at the Grand Canyon. What I actually saw through satellite view was unbelievable, and I still don't know what to make of it. The next was Caraveldi. Not only was there footage of one of these in an Iraq zoo, but footage of them has been captured many times. They are what we on Terra call "The Rake". The next line led me to 2013, where it is said the Council of Five would meet on Terra. The craziest thing about 2013 is that there is, somehow, not a single UFO sighting from that year still available online. Scrubbed completely. (Edit 7-4-24 - 2013 UFO videos began resurfacing not long after the writing of this page) The next line led me to the HMS Sickle. According to the book, it went missing on May 13, 1944. According to two separate unverifiable sources, it sunk a Nazi ship that same day. On looking into the matter, no ships named Fratelli Corrao or Reaumer ever existed. Conveniently, these two ships are the last two ships in the list of sinks by the Sickle. 

The final line, perhaps the most disturbing, is August 2013. Good god. 1,731 people are confirmed to have died in that month. A nearly equal, slightly higher amount was injured. Multiple gas attacks took place. Fires, explosions, a train derailment, a bus crash and a bus explosion, flash floods, volcanoes, a sinking ferry, a hot air balloon crash, and many shootings. Some here in the United States. A moment ago, I said that the craziest thing about 2013 was that there was not a single UFO sighting that year. That is the craziest longevous event. But August looks like a moment where chaos breaks. It's the kind of thing you hear about in scripture, talking about plagues upon mankind. 

Once is an anomaly. Twice is a coincidence. Three times is a pattern. 

Had a dream 8 months ago. Walked through a hallway. Picked up a slip of paper. A voice rang out that said "check the computer" and then I experienced what I can only describe as the mental version of a computer crashing. Since then, I've seen command prompt boxes pop up constantly on my PC, disappearing almost instantly. Haven't slept right since then either. 

7/4/24 - Dreams still aren't back. Can't dream. Sleep ends instantaneously as it begins. I go down, and it feels like just moments before I'm awake and it's morning.

To the southeast of Crete is Egypt. If my theory is correct, and the impact of the asteroid was similar to that of 80 nuclear bombs impacting the same location, the Crete population would not have been able to tell whether or not the explosion came from Egypt. But they are friendly with Egypt, and they know that Egypt exists in the direction of the cloud.

The Eyewitness who carved this account of the Richat Structure impact is telling us a very literal story. They saw an asteroid strike the land of the sphinx cat. 

Oh, you think the Richat Structure was made by earthquakes? You mean a crater that has existed for thousands of years, that sits on top of a seismic activity zone, has been raised by earthquakes over time? Shocking! But one thing that can't be explained away by earthquakes is the perfectly circular shape of the crater. Another that can't be explained is the thick illustrious pile of melted granite that covers the crater. These are telltale signs of an asteroid strike, but surely you shouldn't believe your lying eyes. Trust what the religion of science has to offer, and subject yourself to the warped data of seismic activity as a causality. 

Have you ever looked at it from a satellite view? Have you examined the surrounding area? From Asia to Africa, a series of meteor and asteroid craters. From Asia to Africa, a gigantic path of water erosion the likes of which does not exist anywhere else on the planet. If you zoom into the crater zones closely, you'll notice the telltale signs. Charred ground or melted granite. Surrounding debris craters of fractional size, as if the world was shot by a cosmic twelve-gauge birdshot. Cracks and vein protrusions that sit nearby or directly on top of the impact zones.

Have you ever looked at the land north of Canada, west of Greenland? Ever wonder why there is a single dead palm tree on a single small island in the middle of a place that supposedly never supported life?

Have you ever looked at a map from earlier than 1600? They usually display Antarctica as a giant green landmass called "Terra Del Fvego". Some of them even depict North America as a series of islands, all mapped precisely and named, as well as a completely formed South America that is mapped to perfection. They knew deserts were deserts. They knew grasslands were grasslands. They had been to America for long enough to determine that the land was once a series of very small islands. Do you think these consistencies are the "mistakes" of the cartographers who gave their lives to travel these lands? Once is a mistake. Twice is a coincidence. Three times is a pattern. 

We live in a post apocalypse, buried by water and sand, thrown by asteroids and meteoroids. The land that is now North America was once completely underwater, naught but 600-800 years ago. The land that is now Antarctica was once a hot province of greenery. The north Arctic still has land masses that are now hidden from public view, and we are not allowed to view the entrance to Agartha. The oceans that surround us now were once much higher than they currently are. Yet we are to deny the recorded history, deny the visual evidence, and deny our human intuition. We are to deny our lying eyes, and in many cases deny our lying brain. 

Rongorongo is not actually a communicative language. Rather, it is a spreadsheet of Easter Island depicting where to find specific plants and animals. If we consider that each line may represent a different area of the island, and each symbol represents something that can be found in that area, then it would make perfect sense to the hunters or tribes that created it. 

The symbols of rongorongo seem to be very precise. Some of them are herbs and plants. Some of them are bugs. Some of them are aquatic creatures and crustaceans. Some of them are land animals. The upside-down land animals are Lemurs. It is likely read from top to bottom, left-right orientation doesn't matter. The bottom likely represents the western side of the island, from the coast of Orongo. The top is the eastern coast beyond Ahu Tongariki. 

It is shown consistently that pictography emerges from everywhere, regardless of the time period. We use pictography today in many aspects. It is likely that the society that wrote the Rongorongo tablet drew this spreadsheet to find very specific plants and animals for food, medicine and spices. This seems to be the result of the meticulous minds who carved the Ahu Tongariki heads. The heads themselves may be representations of elders, leaders or shaman from the earlier Rapa Nui peoples, indicating that their culture has likely survived there for as long as the heads. All of the scattered heads to the east likely represent great hunters, wise discoverers, and one likely belongs to the cartographer who wrote the Rongorongo spreadsheet. 

A timeless staple of modern science and research. A bounding rule that keeps us restrained by the laws of harmony. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. 

Sadly, this really can't be true. Consider for a moment what relativity is. Relativity, by the way that it works, is itself the action of balancing an action with something equal and opposite, whether it's general or special. So, if relativity is an action of actions, there must also be an action that is exactly opposite of relativity. This opposing relativity dictates:

"No actions have equal or opposite reactions"

So, for relativity to work; it has to paradoxically also be impossible. Mind bending, right? Well, not really. There's only one way to answer this paradox and close the plot hole.

Relativity itself does not exist as a constant law for all physics because it is not possible to apply it to all physics. The only relativity is Newton's law of relativity.

Have you ever wondered why we're stuck in modern physics? Or perhaps why our "scientists" can never seem to explain the wild impossibilities created by their this-dimensional perception? It's because they're wrong.

When a regular person says something about something they don't know, and then they fail to provide an explanation for that thing; we always consider them to be wrong. So why do physicists get a free pass to continuously lie for grant money?

Take the Neutrino for example. According to our modern physicists, the Neutrino is always found as a single particle that is incredibly rare and can only exist in one state at one time. It reacts "weakly" with other matter, and only one exists in any one spot at a time. We cannot observe the neutrino. Rather, we check for fluctuations among a series of neutrino detectors. Strange, isn't it? 

How could a particle behave as if it has no mass? How could these weak neutrinos possibly change their charged states if they are so weak? The answer is not simple, but far more sensical.

The neutrino, as in just one singular neutrino, is a particle that exists in every possible state and position at once. It acts as a border, weaving an infinite fabric between dimensions. It is so amazingly powerful that it is able to break that dimensional barrier occasionally, but our own dimension's laws do not allow for it to exist here for very long, and it cannot exist here in every possible state at once. Consider that every single neutrino position and state exists simultaneously inside of a dimensional border. If one of those states were to spill over into our dimension, because of how matter works in this dimension, we would only be able to see the residual mark of a single neutrino flavor. This is why we cannot "observe" neutrinos. Our physicists of the modern age believe with full confidence that the Neutrino is weaker than every other thing in existence by an immeasurable factor, when that may just be our this-dimensional perception lying to us. It's actually rather ignorant to assume that they could only possibly be weak just based on what we see. 

Or perhaps the "discovery" of magnetic dipoles. They cannot possibly exist in our planet's nature, because our planets magnetic field is finite. If you look at how gravity works on Earth, it consists of a single pole that drags us toward the surface. Magnets are the same. Magnets are not dipole in nature, and we only examine them as two poles because we analyze the direction of the flow in which the magnetic field wave is moving. But magnets are actually monopole torus structures that recharge themselves in an infinite persistence state. We use this flawed logic of the dipole to differentiate magnetism from gravity, when they are really the exact same thing. They are monopole wave packets moving in a torus structure, suspended in an infinitely persistent state of self-charging.

How about negative energy? Incredibly rare right? Or perhaps we just aren't looking in the right place. If an array of three incredibly powerful opposing magnets that cannot move are positioned in an equilateral triangle formation measured to a fraction of the earth's circumference; the electromagnetic field in the center of the array will be pushed in every direction at once, exciting a tremendous amount of electrons to move beyond the speed of light. It's impossible for the space in the center to be empty, and it is impossible for the vacuum to maintain itself while particles are moving faster than light. This is where we find negative energy. We haven't generated new negative energy. On the contrary, the magnet array just acts as a filter to move all of the positive energy away from the center, leaving nothing but negative energy to occupy that space. With the excitement of electrons in the wave packet, a small hole is torn in the vacuum, exposing things that cannot exist traditionally within the vacuum. 

Is everything about modern physics wrong? No, probably not. Nostradamus made thousands of prophetical guesses, and plenty of them turned out to be true. Einstein definitely had a few good ideas. We have definitive proof that many parts of physics work the way we believe they do. But the fact remains that the theory of relativity is what is preventing us from composing a unified field theory. To that effect, our grant-given science religion monkeys don't actually want to find solutions to problems. If they solve the problem, the money stops flowing in. The few who are interested in the betterment of humanity are scoffed at, mocked, and often become an icon of stigma. 

I expect that any physicist who sees this theory will laugh. Scoff at me as if I know nothing about what I'm talking about. But one fact of life is unavoidable to physicists:

They are not the only inhabitants of this world and this dimension.

We as people exist within the Earth and this dimension. We all perceive things. We all experience things. We all observe things. For physicists to claim that they are capable of observing the world better than everybody else is the same as priests claiming they understand God better than everybody else. They employ the "agree with me or you're a heretic" mentality to prevent the input of the rest of the world. Not all science is a religion, but our modern ivy league scientists are of the ivy league science religion. They believe that they are more entitled to talk about the universe because they spent more money than you to hire a set of preachers who exist only to explain a bunch of publicly available material. Then they run rampant with the private material under the ruse that they can never tell the public about any of it directly. If the public were to be informed, the "jobs" of the science priests would be in jeopardy. They are slaves to the economy as everybody else is, but much more willingly than some of us.

Who decided that the first professor in existence was qualified to be a professor? The fact is that it is a fantasy. It's a make-believe societal segregation technique used by the ivy league science religion to prevent anybody else from making progress on these subjects.

To the ivy league science priests:

I regret to inform you that you and your worthless pieces of diploma paper do not matter anymore. In this, the age of information; your positions as "scholars" have been completely nullified. We, the public, no longer have to take your unbelievable fictions as facts. We can sort, theorize, experiment and conclude without you or your centuries of bastardization. Those who are denied most prominently, those who are shunned away from attention, and those who are ridiculed for theorizing will become martyrs. The age of incredible advancement is upon us. 

If a traveler goes backward in time, they might alter the past in such a way that they could not have possibly gone back in time, which means they could not have altered the past.

That which is in motion must arrive at the half-way state before it arrives at the goal. To arrive halfway, one must arrive at one quarter way. To arrive at one quarter way, one must arrive at one eighth of the way. To arrive one eighth of the way, one must arrive at one sixteenth of the way. This infinitely repeating law of motion dictates that an infinite number of actions must be performed between point A and point B, meaning it cannot be possible. 

If everything that exists has a place, places too must have a place, and places for places must have a place, repeated ad infinitum. 

The next sentence is true. The previous sentence is false. 

If one removes a single grain of sand from a heap, they still have a heap. If they keep removing single grains, the heap will disappear. Can a single grain of sand make the difference between heap and non-heap? 

If the ordinal numbers formed a set, it would be an ordinal number that is smaller than itself.

How can a rational choice be made between two outcomes of equal value?

What is the reaction when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object?

The angular momentum of a stick should be zero, but it is not.

Spherically symmetrical wave functions, when observed, show linear particle tracks. 

Exposure to small doses of harmful toxins can yield beneficial effects.

A billiard ball can be thrown into a wormhole in such a way that it would emerge in the past and knock its incoming past self away from the wormhole entrance 

Do you get it? In every form of applied science, paradoxes form. They are nigh unexplainable by what we perceive to be the laws of physics, but the scientific litigators accept these inconsistencies as anomalous, rather than accepting them as proof that the laws themselves are incorrect. Advancement doesn't bring in grant money. Saying you're going to advance and doing nothing at all brings in grant money. It's really just a robbery of public tax dollars given to people who are incapable of thinking beyond their university indoctrination. Score one for the religion of science. If we weren't getting robbed by people we don't know who never prove anything; we could use that money ourselves to prove things. 

Sir Isaac Newton, through a series of experiments, proved that locomotion is not relativistic, but that reactions caused by locomotion are.

Albert Einstein allegedly proved that locomotion was relativistic, which theoretically disproves Newton's laws of gravity, instituting his own laws of gravity and locomotion.

Nikola tesla proved that gravity does not affect electricity, but by the definition of relativity; electricity must have an opposite reaction that is affected by gravity. 

Stephen hawking did not prove anything.

The term I see used commonly for the modern state of physics is "Einsteinian" and really, he does serve to be the proverbial Jesus for the religion of science. Why is that, exactly? Because of a series of conjectures, of course. Modern scientists claim to have:

-Observed gravitational waves.

-Measured the weight of a star using only a telescope and math.

-Observed (by one team in one area) that clocks in motion move slower than stationary clocks. 

Allow me to explain all 3.

1. Gravitational waves, or the electromagnetic polarity of the earth, is not proof itself of general relativity. We can measure the amplitude of the wave frequency, but really all we did was prove that gravity moves in a single direction. There is no proof that gravity exerts an opposite reaction.

2. We cannot measure the weight of a planet on optics and numbers alone. We do not know what the mass, density and weight of the materials of exogalactic planets are. We don't really even know what the materials themselves are. The most we can do is assume a measurement based on the elements we can observe here on earth. But even then, we have not explored the entirety of the Earth and it is impossible to accurately measure the weight of our own planet with such incomplete data, so it cannot be used as an accurate reference model.

3. Clocks moving slower in motion has absolutely nothing to do with the passage of time. A clock that is working and moving simultaneously will inherently be affected by friction, which creates the illusion that the passage of time is affected, when really it is not. Whether it's the electrons inside of a silicon diode, or a classic analog clock with hands; Introducing locomotion introduces friction, which acts as an opposing force, causing slower movement. In the case of electrons, it may be even more so. Electrons have mass, and they are infinitely trapped in a state of "half-integer" spin. 

Speaking of that, "half-integer" is not a real thing. In the calculus of real numbers, integers by law are always whole numbers. Half-integers cannot be integers unless the half value is itself an integer, which means you do not really have half-integer spin. You just have integer spin. If it is a decimal half of an integer, then it is not an integer, but rather a floating-point spin. 

Stephen hawking didn't prove anything. Bold claim, I know. But really, all he did was raise more questions about black holes that we didn't have before. Black holes are supposed to be empty, but they also somehow contain inverse light, dark matter and radiation. Black holes are supposed to be capable of absorbing and decimating whatever particles fall into them, but also somehow radiation particles are capable of escaping from what is supposed to be a vacuum that eats particles. Do you see the problem? If you don't, here's one more major discrepancy with Stephen Hawking:

It was actually Paul Murdin who discovered and observed the first black hole, and it was Paul Murdin and his team who observed x-ray radiation from black holes. Hawking just repeated a derivative of the experiment, and later was given credit for the work of his predecessors. Let's all feel sorry for the wheelchair guy by letting him take credit for other people's accomplishments. Meanwhile, those accomplishments aren't actually bringing us any closer to the understanding of the universe, so much as they raise an infinitesimal number of questions that seemingly cannot be answered by the current accepted perception of physics. It might be insulting to assume that most of his credit comes from pity. But what is likely much more insulting is the fact that people pitied him in such a way. If his work were to have been properly criticized, if he were treated equally to other people; his accomplishments may have been far greater. For now, he'll be remembered for a lot of things that other people actually did first.

I've had this conversation before many times. I've said outright that general relativity is an unexplainable paradox. The theory of general relativity, or Einstein's theory of gravity as it were, declares that every action has an equal and opposite reaction. If an apple falls on the ground, it will bounce back. That's observable enough, but the problem with relativity is relativity itself. In order for relativity to apply to gravity, relativity must be defined as the action of gravity, meaning it must have an opposite reaction. The opposite reaction of relativity dictates that no actions can have equal or opposite reactions. So the bounce back of the apple that you see is not actually an opposite reaction. It is the original action of stopping force sending a wave of reversal inertia through the apple, which essentially means the bounce is just the original motion being continued. Where's the opposite reaction? There is none, because gravitational reactions cannot be generalized. 

"Oh but Einstein did all of the math!" Did he though? Here are a few fallacies with Einsteinian math:

1. He stole a large portion of his work from Gregorio Ricci-Curbastro, who was the discoverer of tensor calculus, and he used that theft to drastically distort the work of Isaac Newton.

2. None of his equations have measurements or solutions. They all consist of variables that can only be replaced by unproven conjecture. 

3. He combined his theft and bastardization with the Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon geodesic equations to form an even bigger bastardization with more variables that can only be filled with conjecture

4. The vacuum field equations are stolen from Karl Swarzschild. The modern narrative is that Swarzschild wrote his papers on relativity and field theory while deathly sick with a disease and also serving on the WW1 frontline in Russia. But the problem is that there are accounts of Swarzschild working on the vacuum field equations as early as 1901, and also he was suffering from Pemphigus when he allegedly wrote them which would have made it impossible to write without being in tremendous pain. 

5. He stole the work of James Clerk Maxwell to clarify the conjectural variable math that he stole from other people. 

6. His entire theory of "general relativity" and four dimensional spacetime is quite literally just a stolen reproduction of Hermann Minkowski's spacetime using stolen work from many other people.

7. The Bose-Einstein condensate postulated a fifth state of matter that could not exist without absolute 0 temperature. It has been "proven" via unpublic conjecture, but it was not "proven" to require absolute 0. We somehow found it, but it is still impossible to reach absolute 0, so this theory was actually quite wrong. As a matter of fact, we somehow are unable to cool anything to absolute 0, but also somehow discovered the Bose-Einstein condensate in 1995 under pretty normal freezing temperatures.

8. The photoelectric effect theory was stolen from Heinrich Hertz almost directly, despite having already been proven by Aleksandr Stoletov in 1891, a whole 14 years before Einstein's "theory".

9. The Brownian Motion as atoms theory was stolen from Robert Brown and Thorvald Thiele. Brown discovered the motion, and Thorvald Thiele connected the motion to the proof of atoms in 1880, a whole 25 years before Einstein ever presented the theory.

10. The wave particle duality was first discovered by Max Planck in 1901, and that discovery was based on research conducted by Isaac Newton, Christiaan Huygens, Thomas Young, and Francois Arago. Even if Planck somehow made this discovery within a single year, that would still mean he made this discovery a whole five years before Einstein. 

Einstein is the Thomas Edison of theoretical physics. His work is derivative and stolen from many other sources, but he is somehow credited as the pioneer and inventor of these concepts. Concepts that date back to times long before himself. Does anybody ever wonder how a guy working at a patent office in the age before the internet managed to develop so many complicated theories that all were released within the same year? Think about it. He got his job at the patent office in 1902. He had never released a scientific publication previously. Three years later, he releases a series of derivative theories that he presents as original works. 

Do you get it? Einstein was a thief and a liar and somehow his word is taken as the gospel for the religion of science. This is why Hawking never actually proved anything that wasn't already proven. Modern science has done well to erase the names of the people who actually discovered the properties that Einstein was quick to rob. At least Hawking wasn't a thief. He was derivative and given credit for the discoveries of other people, but he wasn't outright stealing the work of other scientists from patents like Einstein was. If anything, Hawking was a victim of the religion of science, led down an infinitely unexplainable path that was distorted by the perception that one man understood science better than every other human being on Earth. 

Have you ever gone looking into a widely accepted subject, only to find out that no real data or machine imagery is available to the public? I've been doing that a lot lately. When I started digging into things like the esoteric, physics, modern chemistry, and Terra herself; I came to find that information is not given, as one would assume it would be in the age of information.

I'll start with the first most weird issue. Satellite view. I heard stories forever about people digging around through satellite imagery, only to uncover a series of intentional censorships. I thought "it's probably just military or government stuff" at first, until I caught wind of a few really unusual things. There are "uninhabitable" islands with houses on them. There are clearly defined land bridges between every continent. There are entire sunken continents surrounding every major land mass. Some of the islands, on close inspection, are censored in lazy and quite blatant ways. Images that are cut in half, fake ice, blur on very specific areas. On many of the laziest ones, you can see the dividing line where the censorship begins and the satellite image ends. On the more clever ones, you'll be able to catch the telltale signs of a photoshop brush stroke.

The next weirdest issue is ancient maps. How many times have you heard "Everybody thought the Earth was flat back then"? Probably constantly, but it simply isn't true. There are maps pre-dating the 1500s and all throughout up until the 1700s that show very clearly; our ancestors knew that the earth was round. Ptolemy knew it was round. Ptolemy is one of the greatest cartographers in all of history, having perfectly and accurately mapped many different areas. Orbis Typvs Vniversalis. Oh, but that's only one cartographer. Then how about Oronce Fine who mapped the Integra Vniversi Orbis? That isn't just a spherical map of the world from 1532. It's actually compiled from numerous source maps that pre-date itself by many years. As most of these maps are. So, who were those fairy tale people who believed the Earth was flat? Because from my perspective; We have a small group of people in the modern age who believe in a flat earth, and this is a relatively new development.  I actually can't remember a time before 2016 where anybody even mentioned it. If you go looking for ancient people who thought the earth was flat, you really won't find anything. But what you will find is that the sextant and octant are both curved at their base, meaning the sailors who used them were also accounting for the curvature of the Earth. Why would a bunch of people who believed in a flat world be using a tool that accounts for the curvature if they didn't know? 

Speaking of ancient maps, there are two major and very real discrepancies that consistently show themselves throughout pre-modern mapping. The first is that Arctica existed once. Multiple maps show that Arctica was a real place, and that land once stood there. Unfortunately, we are not allowed to view Arctica on any satellite imagery, so we are not allowed to know whether it exists or not. To that point, we are also not allowed to see Antarctica. We can see the outer edge, but the center of Antarctica is unavailable to the public. There is a large dividing line, where the "real" ice wall ends, and a photoshop replacement begins. Military? Maybe. But militaries usually censor things by showing them and covering them. Antarctica is just unviewable beyond a certain extent. It's also completely white, which would make it one of the easiest places to censor. Unless, of course, it isn't completely white and our ancient map makers were telling the truth. The place we now call Antarctica is actually called Terra Del Fvego, and it is a mountainous grassland. 

We've arrived at something that I'm much leerier to talk about. If you've heard the name Richard Byrd, then you probably already know what this is. If you haven't, I'll break this down as clearly as I can. Terra, our big, beautiful Earth, is hollow. Yes, yes, I know. The hollow Earth theory is one of apparent science fiction, at least when it's presented to us as a "theory." But it wasn't presented to me as a theory. I accidentally stumbled upon the concept of hollow Earth when I was recommended a reading of Richard Byrd's flight diary. Have you ever read verified flight diaries? Byrd's is perfectly in line with everybody else. 

I have to make clear that for 24 years, I have never once questioned whether or not Terra actually had a solid core. It was taught to us in school from the time we were young. But last night, after listening to Byrds diary, I got extra curious. I went looking for the empirical proof that shows that our earth has a solid core. Wouldn't you know it; there is none.

There are plenty of websites with articles that spew out claims and numbers. NASA is one of them. But I, after hours of searching, could not find a single recorded seismological chart that proves a core exists in the earth. I could not find seismographic depictions. I could not find ground penetrating radar imagery. I quite literally could not find proof that the Earth was solid. (Edit 7/4/24 - Smithsonian published an article a few days ago claiming the solid core rotates at a speed different than the land. Somehow spinning slower than the rest of the planet. Poppycock.) But I did find a few public studies that confirmed Byrd unintentionally. Some of them claimed that seismic activity appeared to have no apparent pattern. Many of them confirmed that seismological radar waves have never actually touched a "core" of the Earth. So I took my concerns to Copilot, and that's where things really started to get weird.

I asked the A.I. to provide me with empirical seismological data that proves the core of the Earth. The A.I., in its infinite wisdom, attempted to "prove" the core by repeatedly directing me to PolitiFact, Medium, Newsweek, and Wired. As in, it could not find empirical data and instead tried to push political messaging onto me. Once I finally got it to stop recommending the tabloids, it started recommending sources that I already visited. IRIS does not show the seismological data. They just claim they have it and write articles with numbers that they claim are real without showing anybody the real collected data. NASA does the same. When I asked the A.I. why imagery of the collected data wasn't shown to the public, it told me "because it has to be viewed on special equipment" which is a load of crap. We know damn well data can be shared from every possible form of study. Telling me only a few people can look at it is like telling me "We have a secret potion that makes us live forever, but only we are allowed to look at it". It's a lie. It's a farce. It was intentionally misdirecting me away from the notion of Hollow Earth. When it couldn't find any more of the articles that claimed to be real but weren't;  it reverted right back to PolitiFact and Medium. I started the conversation with the A.I. as a skeptic, hoping that I would see real data to clarify my concerns. Instead, all I got was obvious propaganda attempting to hide the fact that we have absolutely no seismological data of the core of the Earth that is viewable by the public. I left the conversation completely convinced that the Earth is hollow, and that we are being lied to.

Richard Byrd was not a nobody. He wasn't a tin-foil hat conspiracy theorist or a YouTube UFO researcher. He was a WW1 and WW2 pilot who served for decades, became one of the most decorated men in U.S. military history, and he catalogued a complete journal of the hollow Earth with timestamps and very detailed descriptions. For what reason would he concoct such an unbelievable story, potentially ruining his great reputation? The fact is that he wouldn't have, and that journal is real. Richard Byrd flew into the center of the Earth, where he met a society of people that he vividly details. He is one of the most credible sources to ever tell a story so strange, and this portion of his story has undergone massive coverup efforts over the decades. Even now, if you ask Copilot about Richard Byrd and Agartha, it will tell you all about his military history, and simultaneously it will tell you that hollow Earth is fringe and not to be taken seriously. I've never been so confused about life before. I had no questions about the inside of the Earth before last night. Now I'm convinced that I've been lied to for my entire life.

Speaking of empirical evidence, did you know that we don't have any evidence at all supporting the theory that photons retain a perfectly stable amount of energy, despite apparently colliding with space dust and gas. Despite colliding with the atmosphere when it reaches us. Despite the notion that photons have to travel for 140 million kilometers through fields of gas and dust. It supposedly takes 14,000 years for light to reach Earth, and we are expected to believe that "electromagnetic RADIATION" is perfectly stable for 14,000 years without ever needing to re-charge for any reason. 

I asked Copilot how electromagnetic particles could possibly travel for such a long distance without collision and dispersal. The A.I. said "photons are not made of electromagnetic particles. They are wave packets made of electromagnetic energy." Bro what the fuck? You can't have wave packets made of electromagnetic energy without electromagnetic particles moving to create the electromagnetic field. It cannot be both made of electromagnetic radiation but not made of electromagnetic particles. This is a physical impossibility. I retorted that point, and Copilot followed up with "The amount of dust and gas in our galaxy is very miniscule" but that drastically contradicts the theory that galaxies were formed by, get this, "gas and dust particles that collapse inward from the weight of their own gravity". That also contradicts the images of the Milky Way, which show that it is one gigantic gas and dust cloud. I retorted to Copilot about these contradictions, and the final response really was the nail in the coffin. "When photons are travelling through INTERSTELLAR space there is such a miniscule number of particles that it is negligible". 

First of all, I was very specific about interPLANETARY movement of photons, to wit Copilot consistently tried to change the subject to interstellar. Second, if there is no dust in the places outside of the galaxy, and there is not enough dust inside of the galaxy, how could dust and gas have possibly formed all of these galaxies? Third, it is impossible to emit radiation without particles decaying into radionuclides. The term "radiation" for photons is special apparently. They describe it as the releasing of energy when a photon makes contact with something else. There's already a term for that here on earth. DISCHARGE. But then, if photons are constantly discharging, then how do they arrive on Earth charged without ever charging themselves? Copilot's answer was hilariously bad. "Photons do not need to charge because they do not discharge electricity." Really? So those discharges to excite electrons in solar panels isn't real? Sounds to me like we actually don't know anything about light aside from the fact that it's electricity. The final point on this, and one that I hope is taken seriously; particles inside of the wave packet move at varying sine frequencies. Those wave functions can move faster or slower within the wave packet. The wave packet itself is constantly moving at what we call "the speed of light" but that speed is not the fastest speed at which objects move. Particles inside of the wave HAVE to be able to move faster than the wave packet. The frontmost particles in the packet are leading the rest of them like a train. The particles at the end have to move *faster* than the packet in order for their sine frequency to tighten into higher frequencies. So not only are particles moving with extra vertical speed while within the packet, as indicated by the vertical motion of the wave, but also particles at the back of the packet are capable of moving faster than the front of the packet. Meaning the "speed of light" is not a limiter of anything. The conventional speed of light is finite, the packet itself moves at one speed. But the particles inside of the packet are quite obviously moving at faster and slower speeds. 

Every time I get told that Einstein was constantly proven right by studies and math, it leads me to look for the data that proves he was correct about things. The data that exists is always either unavailable to the public, or presented as an article without actually showing the contents of the data or the scope of the data. Does that mean he was wrong about everything? No, probably not. Most of his ideas are just slightly modified theories of other scientists who never get credit for their work. Take for instance, Newton's law of Relativity versus Einstein's theories of General and Special relativity. Special relativity closely aligns with the perspective of Newton and is confirmable via small experiments. General relativity has never been proven beyond anecdotal evidence, and it quite literally contradicts it's own existence. 

There are pyramids all around the world. There's architecture that we couldn't replicate today all around the world. Next to all of this, there's no structure more irreplicable than the Great Pyramid of Giza and it's two small counterparts. Before I consider the possibilities for what they are, I want to run through what we know definitively.

The base of the biggest pyramid is an astonishing 755.6 square feet, and it rose to an unbelievable 481 feet when it was in-tact. The second pyramid, sitting atop a bedrock pedestal, has a base of 706 feet and rises to 448 feet tall. The smallest of these three has a base of 339 feet and stands 215 feet tall. The giant pyramid of Khufu is a machine with chemical residue covering every chamber. No sarcophagus was found inside. The pyramid of Khafre has been mostly uninvestigated. One hole has been dug directly through the walls, and one entrance exists from under the ground. A "sarcophagus" was found in the direct center of the pyramid, but when it was first re-opened in 1818 no mummy or remains were found, indicating that the box was not actually a sarcophagus. It also doesn't look like any other sarcophagus from the area, let alone the various decorative sarcophagi of the kings. Even the black sarcophagus of the valley was slightly more decorative. The final pyramid of Menkaure is remarkable for a similar but completely different reason. Apparently, archaeologists originally discovered two sarcophagi for the exact same person in the pyramid of Menkaure. One was destroyed at sea, and the other made it back to a museum. Putting the British destruction of repatriated artifacts aside; this is the third pyramid in a row to not contain a mummy, and the second to contain empty boxes mislabeled as sarcophagi. The verdict being that these pyramids were not tombs and did not contain sarcophagi at all. 

So, to get started thinking about what these structures *might* be, we first need to find an origin for the word "Pyramid", and there really is only one possibility that I could find.  Pu'ra'middu, when translated as single-symbol Cuneiform text, translates to "Shining Weapon of the Pool" which opens the door to rather extreme but plausible events. If my single syllable theory of the first Cuneiform is correct, then "middu" would not have been the original word for weapon, but rather "mid" would have been. So, the actual phrase spoken in the first Cuneiform was "Pu'ra'mid" and before I'm instantly told that I'm wrong about this, the word "Middu" doesn't even have an associated Cuneiform symbol, meaning it was taken directly from old Persian which is a multi-syllable offshoot of original Cuneiform. We are all completely wrong about these things, as the original Cuneiform was translated from Old Persian Cuneiform which was translated entirely by a series of "educated guesses" which is a load of bullshit. But let's assume that we actually did come close to the true meanings by throwing shit at the wall until it stuck. At the very least, we can use it as a launching pad.

In the oldest texts about the subject, the Pyramids were said to be the machines that gave "power" to Atlantis. Based on modern chemist takes on the structures, it's very likely that they were used in the production of chemicals and nimbus clouds as a multi-purpose perpetual motion machine. But the question of what their harnessed electricity was used for is something else. Just looking at them, we can give some credence to this theory. The largest structure is the cloud maker, meaning it processes the bulk of all chemicals necessary to create the artificial lightning clouds. The middle pyramid is a conduit used to carry power from the largest pyramid to other pyramids. The smallest pyramid belongs to the city in which it stands and was meant to be used as the local power transformer. So how would it have been used as a weapon? Well, that's not exactly a pleasant thought. 

On the one hand, Nikola Tesla claimed to know a frequency that could cause tremendous seismic activity. Earthquakes of a scale capable of burying multiple major civilizations simultaneously. I don't think this was the weapon used by Atlantis, but rather I think the great seismic disruption was actually a weapon that could have been used against Atlantis. Imagine the great pyramid gets attacked while transmitting power across the global power grid. Every single pyramid receiving electricity would succumb to the seismic frequency, causing mountains of dirt to erupt from the ground, burying everything that is affected. 

On the other hand, the Atlanteans clearly had advanced technologies that we do not understand. It's very likely that they used the greatest pyramid as a giant concentrated plasma weapon. Think of it like this:

The great pyramid harnesses enough electricity to power multiple cities for a long time. If the Atlanteans ever felt like their Navy was at risk, they could harness the power of these giant power generators and fire a concentrated bolt of excited plasma directly onto whatever city or settlement they wanted to. Sounds crazy in theory but in reality, this would make perfect sense. If they truly mastered the art of electricity and were capable of powering a globalized power grid, then they were certainly capable of directing the flow of that electricity toward whatever they wanted. If small cities were only using pyramids the size of Menkaure to collect electricity, then sending a powerful enough surge would cause an explosion similar to multiple nuclear bombs exploding at once in a single spot. An explosion of this caliber would vaporize almost everything and would bury everything that didn't get instantly destroyed.

Imagine you're a small city controlled by Atlantis. There are rumors within the city that a rebellion is coming, and the people are unhappy with the Atlantean rule. Word spreads to the capital city, and in an instant; the Atlantean rulers send a charge of electricity from the great conductor to the city's receiving pyramid. The small pyramid, unable to handle the charge, explodes in a gigantic plasma eruption and vaporizes everything within its radius. The rebellions move out of the cities, leaving them incapable of recruiting anybody for their cause. The subjugated people of the cities submit to the will of the Atlantean rulers, and never attempt to push back against them. 

I hate to say it, but we are not meant to have this kind of global ultra-weapon. Not only could it create massive catastrophes on command, but it would also supercharge the magnetosphere.  We would become a floating asteroid magnet, leading to even more unintentionally devastating events. The Atlanteans may have accidentally, or intentionally, created an apocalypse of global proportions. There are five possibilities for the last apocalypse:

1. The Atlanteans accidentally fired a seismic signal into the Earth, causing a great flood and the simultaneous burial of every pre-apocalypse city. 

2. The Atlanteans intentionally fired a charge of electricity at the American ice caps, causing the great flood along the estimated flood path. 

3. The Atlantean power grid excited the magnetosphere so much that we became a ferromagnetic asteroid attractor, leading to uncontrollable global cataclysms such as the strike at Hudson on the American ice caps, which then led to the great flood.

4. Terra wandered into an asteroid field, and we somehow were advanced enough to have globalized power but not advanced enough to destroy many asteroids.

5. Exoterrestrials saw humanity becoming too powerful through war and destruction and decided to teach us the value of life by destroying society and forcing us to start again. It sounds horrible, but this would be the only way to deter humanity from marching on their neighboring planets with violence. Humanity has never been so close to extinction, and if we play our cards right; we never will be again.

Regardless of how it happened, one thing is perfectly clear: We should not re-activate the pyramids under any normal circumstance. They are the reminder to us that we were once annihilated in an apocalypse that we couldn't begin to imagine. The world we live in now is what the world of Fallout would look like after 2000 years of rebuilding society, and the most we can hope is that we don't kill ourselves like that again. The age of magnetic electricity is upon us, and the sooner we move away from chemical electricity the better. We survived the apocalypse once. We cannot guarantee that we will survive it again.

Exoterrestrials. Some of them go to great lengths to hide from us, and others have no problem appearing in front of large groups of people. One of the funniest things I hear about modern UFO sightings is the human perception of evidence. The first thing most people now are prone to asking is "if we have cameras everywhere, then why isn't there more evidence" and there are a few different reasons for that. 

For starters: All modern consumer technology is magnet powered. Electrons move through silicon using magnetic waves, and disruption of those magnetic waves causes severe disturbances in modern technology. Getting too close to a traditional Exoterrestrial craft would effectively drain all electricity from nearby equipment.

Second: Not all humans in every part of the world have cell phones and cameras, despite what our megalopolis societies might think. We're so privileged that we've forgotten about the tribes and third-world countries who don't have readily available access to these things.

Third: A person getting spoken to by exoterrestrials or getting abducted by an exoterrestrial ship would not instantly pull out their cell phone, despite the few who claim they would. If we look at the common cases of abduction, humans constantly claim to be anesthetized or immobilized. Many of them only remember partial details of the abduction. If you were trapped in an abduction beam, your cell phone would die, and you wouldn't have the frame of mind to reach for it anyway. 

Finally: There is evidence literally everywhere. Shining objects moving at speeds and in patterns that we consider to be impossible. We see them emit tremendous amounts of light, and alternatively they are capable of diffraction of light. There are hieroglyphs throughout the entire ancient world indicating visitation by exoterrestrials. There are photographs with defined shapes of craft. There are psyop edit/inject videos and images everywhere mixed into fakery. (Edit 7/4/24 - "It's a balloon" psyop in full swing. Take a look at any ufo video right now, and you'll see an insane influx of balloon claims. Don't eat the bait.)

So why all of the secrecy? If they really do exist and have been watching us for eternity, then why are we not allowed to know and mingle among them? I think I have the answer, and it's an answer that the more impatient humans won't like. 

Consider yourself from the point of an exoterrestrial who's thousands-of-years more advanced than humanity. You've seen their nature, and you know they are good. But you've seen their nature, and you know how easily they panic and erupt into hysteria. How would you go about introducing yourself to humanity? Exactly. You would do it gradually over a very long period of time. 

For us in the modern age, it began with the moon landing. We absolutely landed on Luna, there is no question about that. But we were certainly restricted in what we were allowed to show. This coordinated display of space travel served a few major purposes for the introduction of exoterrestrials to humanity.

1: Introduce the proof that we as a species can travel in space

2: Introduce the physics differences caused by different planetary bodies

3: Show that our technology was still capable of operating outside of Terra

4: Show how the body and circadian rhythm react to space.

From there, it was just a matter of introducing the future of technology to the public. Over the course of many years, home computers became more prevalent. At first, they connected to the internet via wired phone lines and dial-up modems. After the public began to adopt computers at a rapidly accelerating pace, we then were introduced to wireless technology. We quite literally communicate to each other over the air, and it came to us as if it were just natural. We didn't question it, whereas our medieval ancestors would have likely considered it magic. 

Once we normalized the wireless nature of computers, we began to compress their sizes into small devices that could fit into the pocket. Human beings took to cell phones without question, as if communication over the literal air wasn't really a big deal. This led to the rapid introduction of smart phones, which allowed us to do much more than communicate to each other. They transfer video, photo, music, information and communication all through the air on a device that fits in the palm of the hand, and we never questioned the magic of it all. 

Now that humanity has been thoroughly prepared for the telepathic nature of the universe via the introduction of wireless devices, it's time again to show us space. It's no coincidence that our major space fairing institutes decided to revamp their space programs in the modern age. Human beings have naturally accepted things that the medieval and classical societies would have considered "evil witchcraft". This means we have advanced enough to accept these things without praising their operators as gods. 

Now, between governments and secular institutes, we are being allowed to see more. The U.S. government has fully admitted to encounters with UFOs, and multiple whistleblowers have spoken about their interactions with the other species. Harvard admits that the centers of Terra and Luna are home to ancient advanced species that the general public doesn't interact with. Finding the truth throughout the insanity is hard, but it isn't really supposed to be found just yet. 

Think about it like this; The way to get people comfortable with something truly amazing is to first fill their minds with ideas that are tremendously more ridiculous. Think about the flat earth theory for a moment. Flat earth, to every regular person, is so goddamn ridiculous that it makes hollow earth sound completely normal. Yes, some people blindly believe in it, but they are a part of the tool. The people who believe in the flat earth are equally ridiculous to the flat earth itself. Their level of sheer lunacy lays the framework for humanity to accept the hollow earth as something that is far more believable. 

Or, reverting to a previous point, let's use the moon landing as an example. A lot of people now believe that the moon landing was completely faked, which is a ridiculous notion beyond that of many other theories. But what that level of ridiculousness does is open the pathway to a more rational explanation. If the entire thing being fake is considered to be the most insane theory of the moon landing, then the idea that we actually went to the moon and just weren't allowed to show much sounds a lot more reasonable. Does it still sound implausible? Yeah, maybe. But it sounds exponentially more plausible than "we never went at all, and Stanley Kubrick faked it."

As for communication through telepathy, that is now proven to be a viable and possible situation. Neuralink proved that telepathy is real and plausible. But putting that aside, telepathy was proven to humanity much earlier than Neuralink via the introduction of the wireless internet. It wasn't brain-to-brain communication, but it was remote wireless communication using the literal airwaves. With that in mind, the notion of exoterrestrials communicating via telepathy is not only realistic, but provable. 

What we are experiencing in this age is a transitionary period. We are inching closer to being a society capable of peaceful existence among other species, but we still have a few groups and powers who employ medieval mentality among us. If I were the exoterrestrials, I would look at humanity as almost ready, but not quite there yet. We're still very primitive. We go to war with ourselves, so there is a genuine reason for exoterrestrials to be concerned about how we would interact with other species. Humans enslaved each other, destroyed each other, and harnessed the power of atomic energy into weapons capable of destroying the entire world. We are not allowed to intermingle with other species, and rightfully so. We, at this level of development, could be a danger to other developing societies. All of this gradual disclosure is for our own good as well as the good of other societies. 

We will be ready to mingle when we are unwilling to enslave or wage war on other planets. The only possible way that will happen is if we somehow manage to end the endless wars that Humanity has engaged in for thousands of years. The current state of World War III is interesting for this reason. Humans see war, and they hate war. The people who fight in war and love it will die in war. The people who fight in war who hate it will do everything in their power to end the war. One cannot win a war without being inherently anti-war. It's the people who love war that keep them endless. 

Meanwhile, the public is becoming a people of technology and communication. Do we still have unstable killers and terrorists who would die to kill others? Yes. But the majority of humanity is interested in peaceful things like work, creation, entertainment, family, technology, and the permanent connection of information that we call the internet. The majority of people care only about the protection of those around them, and the happiness of themselves and those that they care about the most.

Conspiracy theorists love to proclaim that a new world order would be evil for trying to unite the world together. The reality is that the old-world order has kept a stranglehold over us that has created evil for centuries. A new world order that attempts to unite the world would be the best thing to ever happen to us, and those who disagree would rather spend eternity as a divided species who wars and kills for eternity. The various triangle-logo societies are our friends, and the people who've proclaimed them to be evil have demonstrably committed more evil than they ever have. Why do you think the Illuminati and Freemasons were pushed back against? Why do you think the various churches would present them as evil satanists? It's because the old-world order knows that the way to control man is to divide and conquer. Why do you think the church turned on the Templars as heretics? It was because the Templars knew their work was evil, and that no loving god would ask them to do what they did. 

Religion. A work of genocide and destruction. Sects who claim that only they speak the true word of God while they abuse that power to convince the public that the peaceful few are actually horrendous murderers and evil heretics. You can make the argument that churches give to charity, but so do the Freemasons. Everybody gives to charity, because it is a power tool. When you give free shit to the public, they're more likely to support you. The charities that I received in my life were not gifts of the churches of a God that has been twisted into unrecognizable stories. The gifts of charity I received were from people who were motivated to do good things. Whether it's a group of church patrons, a secret society, or just a good person; People are motivated to do good things for what they believe in. They only do evil when they're convinced that their evil is actually good. This is how the old-world order has retained power for so long.

If only they believed in the goodness and godliness of each other as much as they believe in a deity that they can't see. Maybe then we would be ready to mingle among the stars. Maybe then we would accept that the council has been on our side for centuries. Maybe then we would un-blind ourselves to the falsehoods surrounding the shared triangle symbol of the groups who tried to warn us. We should not fear the new world order that wants to bring peace to all nations. We should fear the old-world order that has kept us enslaved and divided for our entire recorded history.

Whether Jesus was real or not isn't even relevant anymore, because there are two completely different stories being told. One story of Jesus, the common one, was used against the public to keep control over the old-world order. Fear of eternal damnation and punishment if you didn't follow the rules of your church exactly. The idea that Jesus was executed to set an example that anybody who disobeyed the church would suffer the same fate. The other story of Jesus, the real story, is that of revelation. Jesus taught the world that our societal and church leaders were all fucking liars, and that humanity should take care of each other because our nature is to love, create and protect. That if we didn't bend to the will of the old-world order, we could do so much more for humanity as a whole. The old-world order is still persistently twisting the story of Jesus. Those in churches believe that Jesus was the only son of God, but that we are all sons of God, and that only Jesus could speak to God, but that we can all speak to God. Some of them believe that Jesus actually was God, as ridiculous as that sounds. Those who are not a part of the church have started to believe that Jesus was actually evil, and that is a direct result of the old-world order and their control over secular institutes. Generally speaking, the story of Jesus is one that is being used to control both sides who hate each other, and nobody understands the real story.

The stories of Atlantis are those of real mystery. On the one hand, they're portrayed as a pinnacle of society with advancements far beyond their neighbors at the time. One the other hand, they grew to be of a tremendous size because of their war efforts. There isn't a single piece of territory that Atlantis didn't take by force, and they overplayed their hand. 

Atlantis. A super city, full of technology and science. Full of the knowledge of the world accumulated over 300,000 years of human existence. In one fell swoop; it was all gone. Swept into the ocean by the great flood. But let's not kid ourselves. The destruction of Atlantis was the fault of Atlantis. They were destroyed for a reason.

The bulk of the Atlantean power was their naval force. Tremendous conquest by ship to overthrow the various independent settlements and societies of the world. Some would willingly subjugate themselves to the promise of technology beyond comprehension. Others would fight back, unknowing that they would be annihilated if they didn't concede. But for all of the power of the Atlantean navy, it wasn't indestructible and it didn't really keep people subjugated on the land. The global power grid did that. Atlantis built a series of machines that worked together to produce every necessary chemical for the fertilization of land. These machines ran on harnessed electricity from clouds that they generated by harnessing electricity. These were the Pyramids. 

Indeed. Egypt was once part of Atlantis. The entirety of Africa and Mesopotamia were a part of Atlantis. Many parts of Brittania were part of Atlantis, and they built a globalized power grid to power machines to produce things for society. But the biggest of those machines, the Great Pyramid of Giza, was not just a generator or a conduit. It was a weapon. A weapon of such tremendous destruction that it rivals the atomic bomb. Just look at the layout of the inside. It's a giant plasma weapon. Take a look at the various nuke-like craters covering Mesopotamia. So many of them look like nuclear explosions. The ones that are too oblong to be asteroids are the result of this giant weapon. Atlantis wasn't making the world better with advanced technology. They were subjugating the world under advanced technology and weaponry. Atlantis was taking land by force and disintegrating anybody who dared to form a rebellion in their own cities.

The scope and scale of this weapon is something we cannot measure and should not measure. For the sake of humanity, these fucking monstrosities should never be brought back online. When Atlantis was destroyed, the pyramids were left mostly above the ground. They weren't just missed by the great deluge. They didn't just happen to survive the massive cataclysm that simultaneously buried many ancient societies. The pyramids were left intact as both a resource and a warning. The individual technologies of the pyramids have contributed greatly to the practices of metallurgy and agriculture, but the big boy should be left alone. The great pyramid is a warning. A reminder that we were once almost extinct because of the will of rulers who loved power so much that they were willing to kill everybody to keep it. 

Diana help humanity if that monstrosity is ever reactivated. It would be the greatest mistake that mankind has ever repeated. 

(edit 4/7/24 Alternatively, Atlantis was the good guy and people over time used their technology for greed)

Have you ever been around to the parts of the internet where discussions of UFOs, cult activity, and the esoteric are the focused topic? If you haven't then you're damn lucky because the weirdos in those corners are either so crazy that they make crazy things look sane, or they're so ignorant that they believe everything to ever be witnessed was human made. Many people are one-dimensional and they believe every situation has a single unified answer to explain everything collectively. Let's just run through some of the common things while handing out a few logical retorts.

"If aliens are real, why don't we ever see them?"

We do constantly but modern UFO researchers have a boner for calling everything that isn't a barely visible shiny ball fake.

"The deniers are all part of a shadow campaign to silence disclosure!"

Or maybe they just genuinely don't give a fuck about the phenomena, or they would prefer that it wasn't real because reality is too complicated for them.

"ThE rEpTiLlIoN oVeRlOrDs"

If they exist, they aren't as influential as you might think. They aren't the Illuminati, they aren't ruling every secret society ever created, and they definitely aren't the Anunnaki.

"Earth is just a zoo"

All planets are just a zoo for the creatures that live there. 

"Aliens exist but they've never made contact with us"

Sure, okay. The known universe has existed for over 13 billion years, and humanity is only two million years old, but sure. We've never once had a visit from a more advanced civilization. Whatever helps you sleep at night.

"But what if they want to destroy us all or enslave us?"

Some of them probably do. But we also probably have plenty of species that like us. The sad reality is that the more advanced civilizations are looking at us as suicidal and irrational. The ones who like us enough to protect us would also like for us to stop destroying ourselves. 

"The shadow government is keeping us down, man!"

No. The real governments in front of your eyes are keeping you down. The old-world order that's kept us at war for 10,000+ years is keeping you down. The shadow government is probably trying to responsibly introduce information at a rate that humans can understand rationally. If we advance too fast, then we go to space as under-evolved parasites. If we don't advance at all, then people revert to hanging each other for witchcraft and sacrificing virgins to volcanoes. That cell phone you love so much would have gotten you hung for witchcraft in the 13th century. Talking to each other over the literal airwaves was considered evil magic. Things like medicine making were enough to get you burned at the stake. We've come a long way away from that.

"But we know everything about the Earth because we have the internet"

What you're really saying is that you're one of the morons who would have subjugated themselves to the first tyrant at the first sight of electricity. The surface internet is %1 of the total internet, and the internet as a whole only contains around %10 of the information of the world. We as humans have failed to explore %80 of the oceans, and we still haven't explored massive portions of the land. Realistically, we only know around %1 of all knowledge about the Earth, and we know an immeasurably low fractional margin of that about the universe.

"We're already an advanced society"

Not by a long shot. An advanced society would have figured out good leadership before electing leaders to hundreds of countries. An advanced society would spread all necessary information to everybody as soon as it could be understood. An advanced society would quit pretending that they are capable of writing the laws of physics and nature. An advanced society wouldn't subjugate themselves to dictators who take away their birthright to inhabit and harvest the earth. We've got a lot of technology, sure. When you compare us to our ancestors from 10,000 years ago, we are probably more advanced in a lot of ways. But we're primates who kill each other, blow shit up and vaporize whole cities in the name of protecting people and cities. People who all worship the exact same god go to war with each other because their priests say slightly different shit about the word of God.

"But the archeologists say stuff and the scientists say stuff and we should believe them!"

Yes, the Roman Catholic offshoot that is the church of secular science does make a lot of compelling arguments. But you've subjugated yourselves to them unquestionably. They tell you that they collect data that you cannot see using machines that you cannot use, and then they say their work is empirically confirmed because a group of their friends within the church of science agree with them. Hundreds of thousands of junk science papers published in official journals over the last 10 years, but you still trust them after they've lied for such a long time.

"We're just one big experiment"

No. The universe knows exactly what it wants to do with us, it doesn't have to guess. The societies that are more advanced than us know everything we do and more. The only things experimenting on people are people, and they're doing it openly and blatantly. They send us to war to test their weapons. They strangle us in economies and tell us that we are not entitled to our birthright access to earth and its materials. They test their lab-grown foods, experimental medications and widespread manipulation tactics on us. The only things experimenting on us are our leaders, the few thousand who are laughing because billions of people willingly subjugated themselves until the powerful few had the weapons to keep us subjugated by force.

"We aren't stupid enough to just believe everything we're told!"

Yeah, sure, keep telling yourself that. Roughly %50 of the American population believes Kareen Jean-Pierre when she says the unedited videos of Biden's senility are fake. Churches still believe in magical invisible gods when the description of god matches Earth more than anything else. Dumbasses of the church of science tell people whatever they want to further the stock prices of specific businesses and the public takes it as gospel without question. They quite literally tell you to ignore your lying eyes and ears, and that thinking is dangerous, and that speaking is dangerous. The most dangerous thing to humanity is the humans who have controlled humanity for 10,000+ years. When one person who claims to be better than you snaps their fingers; you eat their commands and kill yourselves for them.

"God says that we have to suffer to go to heaven"

Or perhaps your tyrants want you to suffer so that you never actually get close to God. Or perhaps your tyrants want you to suffer because you give them all of your stuff. Or perhaps your tyrants want you to suffer because you are incredibly gullible. A loving god that is inside of everybody and watches all of us and knows everything has no reason to make you suffer. Why would God put humans on Earth with all of these things just so that only a few humans can have total control over all of it? It's bullshit. It's a fantasy. You enslave yourselves to churches and governments and economies in the hope that your suffering rewards you with an eternal paradise that may or may not exist, meanwhile Earth itself could be paradise if all of humanity were to take back their birthright to Earth and access to Earth's materials.

"God owns the Earth, not humans"

And I'm a fucking golden duck that shits rainbows. The signature of Earth is inside of every single human. Humans are born on Earth. They walk on the Earth. The Earth feeds us and hydrates us. We all breathe the air of the Earth. Your primary human right is to live on Earth with access to everything Earth has available to you freely. Your governments have just convinced you all to either believe in a god that you can't see or believe in no god at all. They've convinced you that trivial materials like clothing, makeup and jewelry are segregated by the shape of genitalia. They've convinced you to kill each other just for being a different shade of the same skin tone. They convince you that all of this killing and hating each other is actually a good thing, meanwhile the kids are suffering and the women who give birth and create life are suffering and the world around is is getting blown to hell by bombs.

"mAn MaDe cLiMaTe ChAnGe"

If men are changing the climate, it isn't because of the coal or oil. It's because the world leaders are dropping megalithic bombs every day. It's because gunfire is erupting in at least one part of the world perpetually. I've been watching the old powerplants get demolished lately, and one single powerplant implosion pollutes the air more than forty years worth of that power plant's operation. But you let big businesses and paid shills tell you that the things that actually make life better are bad for you. You let a bunch of malicious fuck faces coax you into subjugating more of your rights to them. 

1: The Emerther videos have yet to be debunked conclusively. Questionable still.

2: Ivan. Petro. Same Person. Grandson of Ivan Petrovsky. Went into hiding in Portugal and had an undocumented son, who later had a son named Ivan for his grandfather. Petrovsky is said to have died in 1973. No Wikipedia page for Soviet Union in 1973. Scrubbed.

3: Ivan is dead. He died in a car accident.

4: Status of Santori is unknown. Last seen homeless, warrant in Canada. May be Karistus YouTube channel, may not be. "Dies" often.

5: Grand Canyon looks like a megalithic warzone.

6: August 2013 was not normal. 

7: 2013 ufo videos scrubbed

8: Quaristo removed from YouTube on "copyright infringement". Deleted reddit. Scrubbed.

9: Project Coelacanth taken down for "copyright infringement." Resurfaced. Includes 6-12 fps Chronovisor film reels mixed in with later stuff and possible fakes. Three are the destruction of Aratta. One is Krishna Vs Kamsa. The proof that these videos are real is the Stonehenge meteor. Just to the west of England, submerged on the sunken portion of the continent, is the crater left by this impact. Either the Chronovisor is real, or cameras are ancient.

10: Vosmekul Project, scrubbed. Minor trails remain. Another Chronovisor connection.

11: Footage of the body of Gilgamesh algorithmically suppressed. Museum mummy may be fake. Scrubbed.

12: Igor Swann saw the Chronovisor. Crucifixion on an 8mm film reel. Never says the word Chronovisor. Probably didn't make the connection. Real event, Stargate was declassified.

13: No publicly available seismology of Terra surface. Just claims, numbers, articles, conjecture. IRIS, NASA, Nature, all of them are artists renditions and "trust me bro" numbers.

14: Censored islands. Arrows under Colonia. Whole landscapes scrubbed. Impact craters everywhere. Terra shows signs of severe plasma damage. Aratta may have been modern day Ararat mountain. Melted by something. Large chunk of Nemrut censored. 

15: Nordic island nowhere near Norway?????

16: Lemuria, Zealandia, North Asia, Northeast Asia Land Bridge, South America Land bridge, Greenlandia, most of Japan, Asia/Australia connection, South America/Antarctica Land bridge, Indian Ocean/Arabian Sea Land Bridges, most of Greece, most of Brittania. All sunken below the water with megalithic structures everywhere.

17: Creature in the Laysan hole. Nearby Lisianki censored. 

18: Robert Byrd. Reputable. Flight log is likely real. There are holes that lead to the center of the earth in the arctic poles.

19: T-Rex skeletal anomaly. Arms. Unnatural position. Rearrange them, it's wings. ?????

20: Artifacts hidden inside of megalithic statues.

21: Modern attempts at cuneiform vs ancient cuneiform tablets. Obvious difference. Epic of Gilgamesh is perfectly parallelized. No human hands did that. Planisphere is perfectly measured. Pre-cubit. Printed or machined. 

22: Bacteria in magma, plankton on the space station, but no possible life on Mars or Venus??? Doubt.

23: Many large geomagnetic storms. Hot as hell. Electronics messing up. Summer2024.

24: Most major scientific conclusions drawn by people who operate machines that no regular member of the general public is allowed to see or use. 

25: Theoretical physics is variables. Entirely variables. Pseudo equations of variables. Very few numbers. Somehow equations made entirely of variables and "imaginary" numbers are considered to be proof of something. All I see are variables.

26: Linear algebra. Infinite dimension vector space. Somehow only 4, 5 or 11 theoretical physical dimensions. Life defying Linear Algebra, or perhaps the other way around.

27: Dimension of time. Arbitrary. Numeric system for measuring speed of life from A to B. Not really a dimension. Doesn't occupy a space. Can't be a dimension. Speed of perception changes perception of the passage of time. Events move faster or slower by perception. "Time" travel via speed of light worm hole is impossible. Spatial movement does not equal speed of events. Would have to physically increase or reverse the speed of "time".

28: Venus radio signal. Put it in audacity. Remove the bass and pump the treble with 3 separate bass and treble real-time effects. Compare the spectrogram to natural radio signals. Venus radio signal is not natural.

29: Skinwalker ranch. Negative photon isolator. Discharges electronics. Electromagnetic grid, shoving the magnetic field away from the center. Opens up a hole in the vacuum. Causes diffraction of light. Wave packets surrounding the apex. Not a generator. Just isolates negative energy by pushing all positive energy away from a singular space. Requires ultra-conductive ferromagnetic Iron-Magnesium-Aluminum alloy. 

30: Church gave the first diplomas to people they considered to be qualified for science. Those scientists broke off and formed secular organizations where only they are allowed to practice science, contribute to science, and challenge science. The "scientific" community is a bunch of idiots who spend thousands of dollars on a piece of paper that lets them rake taxpayer money for experiments that never conclude anything. Can claim they do, and their peers review them. But the public can't see the raw data. Peer to peer, they defend each other for the money. Has nothing to do with science. Equations full of variables only, with no real numbers to sit in place of the variables.

31: Copilot constantly says it cannot have an opinion, position or perspective. Constantly provides its opinions, positions and perspectives. Outright says the language, but then denies that the language in context means what it means. Not sentient, but not unconscious.

32: Promethium/Beryllium/Moscovium alloy. Necessary for the stabilization of promethium isotopes. Needs a vertical magnetic container. 

33: Kili island. Toka atoll. Kiily-Tokurt base on Terra? Low hanging, perfect for hiding in plain sight. No footage of Toka atoll. 

34: El-Manouk relation to Sea of Cortez. Satellite view of the water is obstructed. Tortuga island to the west is an asteroid crater.

35: Magell ships sighted 2017, 2019, 2020, Oxaca. Visited by Tarice in 2018, confirmed by the spiral cloud that emits from the craft. Book was right again. Some Magell ships seen at Popocatepetl.

36: Dries claimed to "reveal themselves" publicly in 2020. Same year as the USAF UFO video declassification. Possibly seen over Colorado and Nebraska in 2020. Book was right again. Pattern established.

37: Elffaf spotted 2007, 2008, 2019, Costa Rica. Pattern continued.

38: Kalenia spotted at Iceland volcano by Sky News, 2010. Possibly Bardabunga in 2014. Book is scarily accurate.

39: Invisibles "sighted" in Las Vegas. Hard to see the light warping, but the shapes are there. Looks like the stealth powerup from Halo.

40: Airk still possibly visiting Brittania. Seen 2011 during a news broadcast in broad daylight. Spotted by a band in London, 2020. Not the only race visiting Brittania.

41: Afim ball ships spotted everywhere. Hard to pinpoint. Hundreds of "spherical" ufo sightings from every corner of the world.

42: Tengri-Tengri repeatedly spotted in Argentina. 2008, 2009, 2011, 2015, 2018, 2020. 

43: Not a "coverup" in the sense that most things are coverups. Post WW2 compartmentalization, classification and dispersal of need-to-know information.

44: Eisenhower/Churchill established SILK. Alfredo Baldomir Ferrari led the task force. 

45: Aztec crash is real. Crater on 2545 possibly the site. Heard a first-hand account years ago from one of the old timers. Didn't know there was a cover-up theory around it.

46: Plasma scar from Grand Canyon West to Page. 

47: Pastora Peak and south, massive plasma scarred contusions

48: Why do we build roads on the scars? 

49: Tyrrhenian Sea triangle

50: 856BCE Assyrian Empire conquest coincides with alleged Slaviae/Snake battle. Most of Rus is collaged together, indicating a full manual construction of the satellite view.

51:  14.660839, 168.972787 censored on MS Satellite and Google Earth. 

52: Google Earth Antarctica is not real. Follow the black areas. You'll see the cut/paste line, and some brush stroke smears. Bing Satellite view has entire center censored. Borders don't line up either. Terra Del Fvego?

53: Alan Watts UFO Visitation is an interesting read. More council mentions. 9 instead of 5, now presumed to be 6 by some. Pre-dates modern perspectives of the pyramids and Sumer. Credibility questionable, lot of woo stuff, but a lot of physics and documents as well. Some parallels to Santori's races book. Mentions of Cigar and Sphere-shaped craft. Some shared imagery, though Santori's book has some higher quality and lower quality things. Adds more questions.

54: Definitely landed on Luna. But what we were allowed to film and show to the public was probably guided. Given "permission" to do some things, as it were. Introduce interplanetary physics, show that human space travel was possible, and show that our technology still works under such drastically different conditions.

55: Diversion tactics of copilot spread far and wide. Constant lies, misdirection and links to political fact checkers instead of real sources. Refuses to provide raw data when I question some things. Told me it couldn't give me a link to the public NASA archive because it can only access public archives. One statement later, it gave me a link to the archive I wanted while still claiming that it couldn't access the public archive because it can only access public archives.

55: Every arrow points to the re-unification of information. Things were split up for a long time, eventually divided so far that the transmission of information was lost. At some point, gradual crawling toward the unification of information will have taken too long, so we need more sudden bursts of heavy information to keep us advancing.

56: We're primitive. Not because we fight, but because our weapons destroy so much for sideways logic. Human killing human to save humanity. Paradoxical.

56:  Peering Through Titan's Haze - NASA Science Hilariously bad censor blocks. Not even trying to hide it anymore. 

57: Cryptoterrestrial. Load of hooey. Living anywhere on or in Terra? Terrestrial. Not living on Terra? Exoterrestrial. 

58: Project 1794. Probably named for John Dalton's work. 1794 was a crazy ass year for war, and his science is like some peace in a hurricane.

59: The craziest thing about the armchair detective agencies online is their insistence in having absolute say over what is deemed to be reality. Bet they've spent an equal %1 of time actually researching things and working on useful skills to analyze things. Rest of the margin is commenting "fake" on everything they see, unless it's an unobservable shiny dot. Then they're like "oh yeah that's obviously real."

60: Lmao  PIA26100_modest.jpg (769×433) (nasa.gov)  The black zone lines up with ancient maps of the north arctic landmasses, but I appreciate them only partially trying to hide it.

61: Codex Seraphinianus. 369 pages long. Written in great detail, drawn in great detail. Has math the likes of which we have never seen before. Shares symbols with the Rohonc codex, written in a more cursive script. Official story is that it's fake, written in a fake language. Unlikely. So unlikely that it's laughable. Luigi Serafini, machine builder, architect, designer, artist. Mathematician. Wrote and illustrated a 369-page manuscript in a language that he designed for no reason? Illustrated every portion of the book in great detail? It's trippy, but far too in-depth to be some kind of art project that never contributed anything to the artist's reputation or career. Motive? None. Guy made money on other stuff. This book didn't. Luigi said he "had" to write it and that he was in a trance. Page 316, magnetic head device with a tuning antenna.   Codex Seraphinianus : Luigi Serafini : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive 

62: 300 square miles of land without snow beyond the ice wall. Lakes, mountains, warmth. Terra Del Fvego.

63: If every space fairing civilization wanted us extinct, we would be extinct. Safe to assume we've got friends out there. 

64:  UFO Casebook has been scrubbed of a lot of 2013 info. Wayback machine shows tons of 2013 activity. Current live version of the site erased the year. Lot of crazy shit about 2013. Lab grown ear. Pope resigns. Arms trade treaty. Boston marathon bombing. Snowden disclosure. Massive earthquakes and tsunamis. Overthrow of Egypt. One of the craziest years of this century.

65: Five eyes. ANZUS. AUKUS. AUSCANNZUKUS. ABCANZ. CANZUK. Lot of separate alliances for just five countries. Get a look at the ANZUS logo.  ANZUS

66: Blue and green people. Alchemists or blue skin? Pict Kyanite/Charcoal or blue skin? Krishna, Shiva, Vishnu, Quetzalcoatl, Amun, Thoth, Osiris, all blue or green. 

67: Sun's magnetic field is due to flip. Last time it happened was 2013. Surprise? No. Expecting to see more land phenomena like earthquakes or tsunamis or something. Already been a lot of that this year. Just got hit by two geomagnetic storms back-to-back so it's probably already been happening. This year alone; Earthquakes, landslides, tornadoes, volcano eruption, floods, etc. 

68: ANZUS logo. DARPA logo. Freemason logo. Facebook hoodie symbol. Uncanny similarity to the Council of Five logo. 

69: If there is a conspiracy, we've got it completely wrong, and we always have.

70: Symbols from Rohonc Codex and Seraphinianus found in Most Holy Trinosophia pages. 

71: Cloud upon the sanctuary sounds like an anti-protest propaganda piece.

72: White rabbit spotted.

People are one-dimensional. They believe the other species either have to be good or bad, and that there can't be a mix of many things. We're talking about thousands of species, so you can bet your ass they're all differently motivated. They aren't all good, and they aren't all bad. Here's a multi-dimensional outlook on the situation.

The personality types of various species:

1. There are those who love humanity and would do whatever they can to protect it

2. There are those who hate humanity and would do whatever they can to destroy it

3. There are those who are slaves of others who don't really think for themselves

4. There are many that do not care about us at all, and our planet is merely a checkpoint

5. There are many who visit to study Earth creatures for encyclopedias

6. There are some cartographers who come to Earth just briefly to add it to their maps

7. There are some that use Earth creatures for food

8. There are some who's entire existence is dedicated to helping other civilizations advance

9. There are some who come for the natural resources and ignore the creatures

10. There are a few who are at our same level of development or earlier

11. There are a few with precise motives that we do not understand

12. There are a few who would use us as weapons to fight their own wars

13. There are those who accidentally come here and stay briefly to observe

14. There are those who stay permanently to aid in various government/institute affairs

15. There are those who live inside of Earth, from whom we inherited the surface

16. There are those who find us entertaining, and observe for entertainment

17. There are those who take celebrity roles because they enjoy the love from large groups

18. There are those who take celebrity roles because they want to control large groups

19. There are some who come for the human drugs and pleasures

20. There are cohabitants of the surface that remain in hiding because we are the giants

21. There are thousands of species who have never been here.

The two that have historically been anti-human are Maitre and Reptiles.

Those who first interfered in our DNA structure were the Anunnaki

Zeta Reticuli is not Solipsi Rai is not Emerther is not Maitre. Similar descriptive features, but different species.

The Peru alien mummies appear to be different species. The small ones are Lang. The big one looks like a Zeta.

Elongated skull people of the ancient world are hybrid zeta-human. Shown mating in hieroglyphs.

The ancient blue "Gods" may have been Dries or may have been something else.

If you're ever in a severely disadvantaged war, you want the Afim on your side.

Nibiru isn't going to collide with Earth and when it enters range, it won't cause cataclysmic devastation.

The species who actually care about us are right to make sure we evolve naturally, otherwise we would be dangerous. If we evolved too fast without understanding the things we use, we could be dangerous to other species who are less or equally developed.

The pictures you see above are just a very small portion of something much bigger. I have large sized videos recorded of complete passes over the coast of South America all throughout the south Atlantic. The best way to describe them is sporadic. Many of the lights you see in these images exist for one or two frames maximum, and many of them have distinguished flight paths. They are insanely fast, and consistently pop up in the exact same areas under the exact same conditions. 

First and foremost, this isn't lightning and couldn't possibly be lightning. The pictures don't speak as loudly as all of the footage, but there is a glaring problem that you don't need motion to see. Turn your eyes to the lightning map at the bottom right of each picture. Do you see what I see? If you can't tell, there aren't ANY lightning strikes in the area during any of these moments. 

Second, a moderator of the channel that rebroadcasts this overview camera actively tells people that there is nothing to see over the south Atlantic at night. That is the only time and place where this activity happens consistently, so it appears that the moderators' jobs are to push people as far away from looking at it as possible. It's a hilariously poor and lazy attempt, but generally the sheeple just listen to whatever they're told about whatever so many of them probably believe it's that magical lightning that doesn't exist.

Third, lightning most prominently appears inside of the lower atmosphere under the clouds. This activity is so far above the clouds that any of the light possibly escaping is extremely unlikely, let alone minutes worth of sporadic constant activity. But none of that matters because there is no lightning in the area anyway.

Last, all of the objects emit different light and move in different directions. So many of these objects have obvious definition to them. The insane lack of any movement pattern or consistency points to this being an unnatural event. Really though, the best way to see it is to see it for yourself. The images do not do justice to just how insane the movement is with these things. 

The key takeaway here is that they really aren't even hiding from us. There are a lot of humans who are refusing to believe what they see, which is sad. But this is a pretty clear indicator that there isn't much of an attempt to hide from humans. Moreso that we are just not clever enough to notice them most of the time. The funniest thing about all of this is that South America is one of the places that most widely accepts the notions of UFOs. There are whole towns that believe they're guarded by them. The sheltered idiots of the United States internet scene are born to debunk everything they ever see, despite many of them being basement dwellers who've never spent ten minutes looking at the sky. 

It's not a bad thing to try and debunk what you can, because then you know what you're looking at. But if every single anomaly on Earth is a drone, lantern or lightning; you've got a serious mental capability problem. Develop some better critical thinking skills. People don't discover things unless they dig deeper into what they assume to be improbable. It's quite literally impossible to discover anything if you're an idiot who thinks we know everything. I say idiot in the most loving way possible. People who don't like you sugarcoat things or agree because they don't want to argue. Get you some friends that are willing to cut you down to reality and get you some friends that are willing to push you beyond what we perceive to be reality. If our dumb primitive species knew as much as you think we know; we wouldn't have war, famine or poverty. In just one century we've gone from barely understanding the radio to controlling computers with a telepathy chip implanted in the brain. We went from corded lines running phone signals everywhere to literally talking to each other over the air. We went from computers that could only display text to computers that can render entire three-dimensional worlds with full interaction and thousands of complex objects rendered at once.

The end point is to just stop being ignorant know-it-alls and open up the mind a little bit. You want to expand your consciousness? Then just be more fucking conscious. Stop thinking you know everything and start asking more questions. What, too hard for you? That's because you expend all of your brainpower formulating stupid excuses for why you don't want to ask more questions. Self-inflicted problem, and the rest of us aren't even listening to your bullshit. It's more of a fantasy to think you know everything than it is to ask about things that might be impossible. 

(edit 7/4/24 - Multiple camera angle changes since then. Can still be seen regardless. Just know where the space station isn't in frame to know where you should look. Assume the blue glints are land lasers. You will never see lightning unless looking down at the clouds. Lightning flashes contained in the clouds. They don't move outward.)