Consider for a moment your standard magnet. We perceive it to have two poles. One north that attracts to the south, and when a north touches a north or a south touches a south; they repel each other. But what if this is actually not the case, and is an illusion that has hidden magnetic monopoles from us for so long? This theory proposes that magnetic fields are only monopole in nature, and that our observation of two separate poles is an illusion created by energy collisions. I will attempt to explain the behavior of magnetism as if it is an unchangeable singular wave operating on a single polarity flow. I will also provide an assumptive variable equation that might be used to measure the area of vacuum disruption. This theory will attempt to unify the understood principles of relativity with our understanding of the quantum behavior of the universe, while also providing the potentiality for the observation of abnormal particles and the infinite production of energy.
When a lone magnet has no partner to attach to, the magnetic field of the north bends outward and reaches to the closest field of the south. But what if it is actually a monopole torus that is suspended to only move in one direction? Let's consider some practical physics first.
Energy cannot be created or destroyed. So, let's assume for a moment that two opposing energy waves that are flowing in individual unbreakable single poles attempt to touch each other. What do you think would happen? By our current understanding of energy, the particles would be moving so fast that they could not be seen, and it would be impossible to destroy them. They would collide at such a frequency that the opposing waves could not break into each other. The particles in the wave would be moving so fast that they maintain a constant singular polar orbit, so there is no other choice but to repel.
What we consider to be the "south pole" is actually the area where the waves are turning back inside of the magnet. But if two waves moving in an equal direction at an equal speed are to collide with each other, they will connect to each other as if pouring water into more water. This suggest that magnets are actually a suspension vehicle for pre-determined movements of monopole magnetic waves. This illusion of two poles is just the law of energy preventing energies that are indestructible from destroying each other. That would mean that magnets are suspended within an infinitely persistent self-charging electromagnetic field. If the singular wave moves as one mono-constant, then it can be observed as either dipole or monopole. We unfortunately just observed it the wrong way for a while because we could not understand what we were actually seeing.
Now this is where it gets a little more interesting. Consider the speed of light, 299,792,458. Now consider that these electromagnetic wave packets move at a constant that is equal to the speed of light. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle states that we cannot know the momentum and position of a particle with absolute precision, but we don't really have to. In this case, we need only to assume that the electromagnetic monopole torus is moving at a constant equal to the speed of light. If two of these monopole waves were to oppose each other, it may excite particles within the packet to move at speeds slightly above or below the speed of light. While we cannot observe this happening and measure it directly, we can use something entirely different to experiment with the concept.
Consider that the electrons of two opposing waves cannot actually collide with each other in the way that we typically observe collision. Instead of the waves repelling each other with any noticeable force, it's actually like rubbing two sleek surfaces together that slide evenly. At the apex where these particles are opposing directly on both torus structures, the electrons of the electromagnetic field are exciting and attempting to move at a speed faster than the speed of light because the speeds of the two torus structures are boosting from infinite persistence ground states into variable persistence excited states. This theory would be testable by measuring the frequency at which virtual particles may appear or disappear. If excited electromagnetic wave packets somehow manage to move faster than the known speed of light momentarily, it may create a dimensional rift due to frame dragging in observable space, allowing for the appearance of unfamiliar particles such as virtual particles or perhaps even neutrinos. Since nothing can move faster than the speed of light within the vacuum, it would theoretically rip a hole in the vacuum, allowing for the temporary leakage of interdimensional particles.
There are also implications for dark energy. If we assume that these micro destabilizations in the vacuum cannot extend beyond the area of the excited particles, that will assume a controlled ability to open holes within the vacuum that do not pose a risk to the greater stable structure. The vacuum can likely not be destroyed, indicating that these micro rifts would instantaneously repair themselves when the electromagnetic field returns to ground state. The holes can also not be bigger than the excited state because the particles of the vacuum are actually just pushed aside and are constantly attempting to rejoin in the position where they belong. They just can't rejoin against the force of particles that are moving faster than light. That would allow for the rift to be open for a long enough period to observe any potential dark energy that might exist parallel to the spatial position of the vacuum.
We actually may be able to measure the size of the vacuum disruption as well, assuming that the disruption can only exist as an element within the area of a pre-determined circle, in a way similar to this:
(H = ( (L / A )/ (λ × f ) ) / Fq) ∋ π * r²
Where H is the size of the hole
Where L is the speed of light
Where A is the area of both waves
Where (λ × f ) is the velocity of the wave disruption treated equal to a wave function,
Where Fq is the assumed frequency of the wave
Such that the size of the hole is contained as an element of π *r² in relation to the size of the meeting magnetic torus structures.
Under such conditions, the vacuum would be unable to maintain its density within the area of affliction. This would create a vacuum disruption where excited electrons in the electromagnetic wave packet are breaking through the vacuum to move at a speed higher than light. By the law of the conservation of mass, the vacuum would just get pushed away from the disruption zone, stuck in a persistent state of attempted self-repair until the disruption closes. That by extension prevents the spread of the disruption beyond that of the area of the colliding electromagnetic fields. It has to be circular based on the interaction of the two electromagnetic torus waves.
The primary argument against common magnets being monopole in nature is that we detect two magnetic poles. But how do we do that? Ah, yes, that's right. We detect magnetic poles based on the direction in which the wave is moving. So even though we only observe one kind of particle, we test for dipoles using the attraction or repulsion of the torus. Does that mean magnets have two poles? No, absolutely not. If anything, it is further evidence to the monopole nature of the magnet. Since we cannot detect particles that behave as a second pole, we cannot definitively conclude that magnets are dipole in nature. The most we can do is say "There's a wave, and we know one part of it refuses to connect with another wave moving in the opposite direction." This notion further indicates that the magnetic field is actually a torus of indestructible energy that cannot collide at opposing directions because energy cannot be created or destroyed.
But then why can we pull magnets apart? Well, because the particles are moving at the speed of light perpetually, they actually demonstrate themselves as particles that don't adhere to any friction. We can assume that this lack of friction is evident in the movement of the torus. The torus is suspended perpetually around the magnet material because the magnet material itself is the conduit that keeps the torus moving, indicating that the particles must pass through the magnet in order to retain their infinite persistence. Since there is no friction, we can separate the wave from itself without any particles colliding. As the strength of the magnet itself and the size of the torus structure increases, the strength of the wave begins to counterbalance the strength of the human arm, which is why it is harder to separate higher powered or larger magnets than it is to separate magnets that fit in the palm of the hand. The particles can only collide with each other when two wave packets moving in opposing infinitely persistent directions meet with each other, which would not be the case when splitting the wave in two. The magnetic torus monopole is so super-stable that the direction of the wave remains unaltered under conditions such as elongation, separation and physical blockage. The wave can be made smaller, but the polarity of the wave cannot change suddenly due to size reduction.
Let's also consider the idea of clean renewable energy. I don't stand on the side of man-made climate change because the climate has been proven to naturally exhibit minor changes over hundreds of years on factors that outweigh human society by a substantial degree. But I do consider the effects that a cloud of pollution can have on the oxygen quality of an area, and I consider the repercussions of using large machines to harvest energy such as invasion of sea and sky animal ecosystems. I also consider the instability of nuclear energy and the potential for a meltdown to cause an unprecedented explosion, or another event similar to Chernobyl. If two of these torus structured monopoles were to collide at their opposing peaks with enough power, that would create the excitement of electrons at the apex connection of the waves. The electricity of the excitement could be harvested at the ground level, mitigating the need for solar panels and wind turbines. It's less invasive, non-pollutant, and infinitely persistent. Sure, power companies won't like that idea, but I don't really care what they think or what they want. Human advancement is more important than corpocratic economics.
In conclusion, the dipole magnetic structure is only two poles if observed from that perspective. If electromagnetic waves that are suspended in magnets are observed as monopoles instead, that would clarify many current issues with the unification of various theories. It may perhaps even lead to an entirely different understanding of the universe and how the various dimensions of space move and interact with each other. I know that the idea of a long misunderstanding is one that is hard to accept, given how long we have perceived magnets in nature. But the perception of magnets as two pole interactions has never really been questioned and is worth considering. Everybody has been searching for a monopole that has elusively evaded us for quite some time. The universe is more elusive than we could ever imagine, so this is actually a rather small step toward something much greater.